I'm Dudley Storey, the author of Pro CSS3 Animation. This is my blog, where I talk about web design and development with HTML, CSS and SVG. To receive more information, including news, updates, and tips, you should follow me on Twitter or add me on Google+.

my books

Pro CSS3 Animation book coverPro CSS3 Animation, Apress, 2013

my other blogs

Massive Head CanonMassive Head Canon: Intelligent discussion of movies, books, games, and technology.

my projects

The New DefaultsThe New Defaults — A Sass color keyword system for designers.

CSSslidyCSSslidy — an auto-generated #RWD image slider. 3.8K of JS, no JQuery.

“Should I Learn XHTML Or HTML5?”

A short guide to help aspiring web developers make their first decisions in education.

Deciding when and how to teach HTML5 is perhaps the most significant challenge facing web development in formal education. Whether you are learning in a classroom, online, or from books, determining which technology to tackle first is something everyone interested in web development must decide as a matter of course.

Right now web development is divided between two different versions of HTML: XHTML (traditional, established, well-supported) and HTML5 (new, hot, and under development). As modern human beings tend to be in love with the new, a lot of people jump directly into HTML5.

In my opinion if you intend to work in the web development industry you’re probably best served learning XHTML first and progress into HTML5 later, at least for now. My rationale rests on seven foundational principles:

  • I find that people respond better to the relatively strict rules, structure and predictable nature of XHTML vs. the more forgiving, free-form, anything-goes syntax of HTML5.
  • Learning XHTML first allows one to branch out and explore other strictly XML-based technologies such as SVG and RSS, a task that will be made much more difficult if you only know the relative looseness of HTML5.
  • HTML5 is still up in the air as a spec. While the rate of alteration has slowed since the spec has entered Candidate Recommendation status at the W3C, changes are still occurring frequently. Learning is made more difficult by shifting sands, whereas the bedrock of XHTML provides a solid foundation of knowledge.
  • Perhaps more importantly, no browser currently supports the entire HTML5 spec. Learning something like the new HTML form elements carries the massive proviso of “no browser understands this stuff completely”, which can be difficult for novices to appreciate or understand.
  • In my experience XHTML is also an easier context in which to learn the principles of accessibility; ARIA roles offer a useful bridge between XHTML & HTML5.
  • A good deal of work over the next few years will be translating XHTML pages from older sites into HTML5. To do so effectively, developers need to know both languages, and it is easier to progress from XHTML to HTML5 than the reverse.
  • HTML5 is not HTML5. Many beginners assume that HTML5 (the markup language) contains features it does not, such as CSS Animations and Geolocation. This leads to frustration and “leapfrogging” (appreciating just the part of a technology that solves an immediate problem, rather than understanding all of it).

It’s important to note that this course of action is only applicable to those who desire a career in web development: if you’re only interested in making a website for yourself, you should feel free to go straight to HTML5 or jump into a CMS such as SquareSpace or WordPress. That’s the difference between occupation, craft, and play. It’s also advice that is open to change: in 2015, after the HTML5 spec becomes a W3C Recommendation and IE7 and 8 are dim memories, my advice may well change.

If you have a differing point of view, feel free to share it in the comments section below!

This site helps millions of visitors while remaining ad-free. For less than the price of a cup of coffee, you can help pay for bandwidth and server costs while encouraging further articles.